Technology for Command and Control Centers
Designing and building a command center nowadays is more difficult and sophisticated than ever before. Designing a command center is now more difficult than ever because of new organizational difficulties, emerging technology, and changing threats.
Command and control centers are distinctive and difficult places. The equipment used in command center consoles is as durable and dependable as it can be, and it is made to function at its best all the time.
A good command and control center depends on technology. You require information right now that is accessible to everyone. The major focus of your control center’s design is its audio, visual, keyboard, and mouse (KVM) systems. Technology for mission-critical video walls enables your engineers to make wise choices.
Our user-friendly control systems give your team a simple-to-use interface so they can quickly view the sources they need to monitor. In some situations, a wide variety of sources must be available to be watched on the video wall as well as the consoles.
The Evolution of Consoles
Component-based systems, many of which were contained in consoles, were widely utilized in the Command Center of the 20th century. When systems were component-based and users controlled them directly with knobs and switches, the idea of a console first emerged. In order to contain, safeguard, and aesthetically conceal this technology, consoles were needed for the closely related, direct human-machine manual contact.
Systems are primarily computer-based and located in data centers in today’s command centers, with computer GUIs serving as the primary interface between humans and machines. Since their offspring are now computer-based and kept at the Data Center, the majority of the equipment that was originally kept inside consoles is no longer in use. These computer-based solutions eliminate the requirement for operators to be close to the systems by enabling interaction with the systems from any location having network connectivity. Many businesses choose to keep workstation computers in data centers and give operators remote access from their desktops via a network using KVM (Keyboard/Video/Mouse) extension technology, removing even workstation machines from their settings.
There are few outliers, with some organizations still installing PCs under desks in the Command Center, but these are disappearing as they realize that this poses a security concern in addition to being ineffective from an operational standpoint. Computers kept in a data center are more dependable, last longer, require less maintenance, and are protected from unauthorized physical access.
True, conventional consoles are no longer necessary in this setting, and many businesses are opting to adopt lighter, less expensive, reconfigurable furniture that offers greater flexibility. Users could instantly change locations by moving their keyboard, mouse, and screen to a different network connection because all systems were housed in a Data Center.
Security Threats Keep Changing
Security managers now deal with a danger landscape that is much different from what it was for the most of history. Threats today have a greater potential for harm than in the past because they come from new sources, have different goals, and adopt different execution patterns.
These dangers are always changing as nefarious people and organizations look for new ways to get around security safeguards. To combat these attacks, security managers and their Command Centers must always be one step ahead of them, necessitating the adoption of innovative technology.
Extremely Difficult: The Amount of New Systems and Functionalities
The introduction of so many new technology is one of the most astounding changes to Command Centers. There weren’t many systems for Command Center designers to learn in the 20th century. The majority of 20th-century businesses used just a few security technologies, like CCTV, access control, and intrusion detection.
However, there are now a lot more systems to deal with as a result of the convergence of security and information technologies. Organizations nowadays are putting biometrics, PSIM, high-definition video, digital video surveillance, video analytics, mass alerting, and other systems into practice.
Implementing security solutions in the past required only a little amount of forethought. Security Managers were aware of the systems they need, and there wasn’t much of a functional difference between them. Cost and capacity were frequently the key factors separating different systems.
However, today’s systems are significantly more numerous and functionally diverse than those of the past. Additionally, some functionality across several product categories has overlapped as a result of the growth of security technology. Making an informed decision requires having a complete awareness of the available options and technologies.
Conclusion
Today’s organizations tasked with maintaining public safety face unheard-of difficulties. The design of Command Center technology is now more challenging and dangerous than ever before due to constantly changing threats, organizational difficulties, and new technologies.
But you may avoid the traps that are so typical in Command Center design by integrating the technology designer from the beginning of the project, employing disciplined procedures, and working with a team that has the expertise to lead you securely through the process.
